Post by President Mac on Aug 4, 2019 9:37:44 GMT -6
Overhauled, Updated and Automated for Season 25 (2024)
Entire SC will be Automated with CLICK and CHOOSE for each section
SCORER ID: ___________ (Personalized to you as assigned by Mac)
SHOW ID: __________________ (IE: BRAWL #999)
WRESTLER NAME: ___________________________________________ (Name of Wrestler You Are Scoring)
RP TITLE: __________________________________________________________________________________ (Copy/Paste RP Title)
MATCH RELEVANCY (6 MAX)
Opponent(s) Mentioned By Name: [YES] 1 PT [NO] -1 PT
Event or Location of Event Mentioned: [YES] 1 PT [NO] 0 PTS
Match Stipulation Mentioned [YES] 1 PT [NO] 0 PTS
RP Relevance to the match: [MATCH/OPPONENT: HEAVY] 3 PTS [BALANCED] 2 PTS [BARELY RELEVANT] 0.5 PT [ZERO RELEVANCE] -1 PT
ARGUMENT (6 MAX)
Was the argument logical & got over why/how they'd win? [YES] 2 PTS [SOMEWHAT] 1 PT [NOT AT ALL] 0 PTS
Did the argument sell the wrestler, match type, stakes & opponent? [YES] 2 PTS [SOMEWHAT] 1 PT [NOT AT ALL] 0 PTS
Did the argument demonstrate that the wrestler knew their opponent? [YES] 2 PTS [SOMEWHAT] 1 PT [NOT AT ALL] 0 PTS
Did the wrestler get any glaring facts wrong about the opponent or event? [NO] 0 PT [YES] -0.5 PT [MULTIPLE FACTS WRONG] -1 PT
CHARACTER WORK (8 MAX)
Did the RP further the character as a person? [YES] 1 PT [NO] 0 PTS
Did the RP further the character in regard to their EWC career? [YES] 1 PT [NO] 0 PTS
Did the RP grow the character based on recent wins/losses/title or tournament wins/losses [YES] 1 PT [NO] 0 PTS
Did the RP have emotions on display through visual or somatic aspects? [YES] 0.5 PT [NO] 0 PTS
Did the RP display the character mannerisms? [YES] 0.5 PT [NO] 0 PTS
Did the RP have world building to further the scene and argument as a whole? [YES] 2 PTS [SOMEWHAT] 1 PT [NOT AT ALL] 0 PTS
Did the scene help showcase/highlights the characters gimmick? [YES] 2 PTS [SOMEWHAT] 1 PT [NOT AT ALL] 0 PTS
FLOW (4 MAX)
Was the RP easy to read and follow from start to finish? [YES] 1 PT [NO] 0 PTS
Did the RP have a clear ending? [YES] 1 PT [NO] 0 PTS
Did the RP transition smoothly from scene to scene? [YES] 0.5 PT [NO] 0 PTS
Did the RP transition smoothly between thoughts? [YES] 0.5 PT [NO] 0 PTS
Was it clear on who was speaking and when or what was thoughts vs narration? [YES] 0.5 PT [NO] 0 PTS
Was the RP appropriately paced or did it feel rushed/too long? [YES] 0.5 PT [NO] 0 PTS
CREATIVITY / ENTERTAINMENT (8 MAX)
Scene/location selection - is it clear where in the world the RP takes place? [YES] 1 PT [NO] 0 PTS
Scene/location details - do we get a sense of the world & the surroundings? [YES] 1 PT [NO] 0 PTS
Scene/location creativity - did the RP take place in a unique setting/location? [YES] 1 PT [NO] 0 PTS
Did the RP elicit a reaction? (laugh, gasp, etc) [YES] 1 PT [NO] 0 PTS
Overall creativity of the RP from word play to location settings [VERY CREATIVE] 2 PTS [SOMEWHAT CREATIVE] 1 PT [GENERIC] 0.5 PT
Overall entertainment value of the RP [ENGAGED THE ENTIRE TIME] 2 PTS [ENTERTAINING IN PARTS] 1 PT [TOO HARD TO FOLLOW] 0 PTS
--
FEEDBACK: ______________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
(1) Do not be rude, someone spent time to create this RP.
(2) Offer SPECIFIC feedback that will help the writer to improve in each of the areas they didn't get max points. "Could have been better" is not acceptable feedback.
(3) Mention at least one area that stood out as positive that the handler can build on
[SUBMIT]
(Score Total Will Be Tallied and Made Available to the Showrunner)
BREAKDOWN OF WHAT TO LOOK FOR
MATCH RELEVANCY
Opponent(s) Mentioned By Name: [YES] 1 PT [NO] -1 PT
- Did they mention the opponents directly by name, yes or no? (EWC Rumble will have its own SC - this will be amended for it)
Event or Location of Event Mentioned: [YES] 1 PT [NO] 0 PTS
- Did they mention the match/event location or the event itself, yes or no?
Match Stipulation Mentioned [YES] 1 PT [NO] 0 PTS
- This is an easy 'gimmie' if its a standard 1v1 with no stakes.
- If this is a title match, a tournament, gimmick etc, do they mention it, yes or no?
RP Relevance to the match: [MATCH/OPPONENT: HEAVY] 3 PTS [BALANCED] 2 PTS [BARELY RELEVANT] 0.5 PT [ZERO RELEVANCE] -1 PT
- If the RP mostly focused on the match & opponent: 3PTS
- If the RP has a pretty balanced attack with match/opponent and Character Work: 2 PTS
- If the RP barely mentions the match/opponent and is mostly Character Work: 0.5 PTS
- If the RP is entire Character Work and no mention of the actual opponent/match at hand: -1 PT
ARGUMENT
Was the argument logical & got over why/how they'd win? [YES] 2 PTS [SOMEWHAT] 1 PT [NOT AT ALL] 0 PTS
- Self explanatory
Did the argument sell the wrestler, match type, stakes & opponent? [YES] 2 PTS [SOMEWHAT] 1 PT [NOT AT ALL] 0 PTS
- If they sell most of the above: 2 PTS
- If they sell some of the above: 1 PT
- If they sold none of the above: 0 pts
- Selling an opponent: Talking about them, acknowledging strengths, weaknesses, getting them over as competition, no matter weak or strong
Did the argument demonstrate that the wrestler knew their opponent? [YES] 2 PTS [SOMEWHAT] 1 PT [NOT AT ALL] 0 PTS
- Did the writer show any working factual knowledge of the opponent, demonstrating they did some kind of research?
Did the wrestler get any glaring facts wrong about the opponent or event? [NO] 0 PT [YES] -0.5 PT [MULTIPLE FACTS WRONG] -1 PT
- Did they say things about the opponent/event that are obviously and glaringly incorrect?
- Did they make multiple obvious/glaring mistakes about the opponent/event?
CHARACTER WORK
Did the RP further the character as a person? [YES] 1 PT [NO] 0 PTS
- Outside the ring type development
Did the RP further the character in regard to their EWC career? [YES] 1 PT [NO] 0 PTS
- In-side the ring type development
Did the RP grow the character based on recent wins/losses/title or tournament wins/losses [YES] 1 PT [NO] 0 PTS
- Self explanatory
Did the RP have emotions on display through visual or somatic aspects? [YES] 0.5 PT [NO] 0 PTS
- This can be expressed by actions, by words, by thoughts or by narration
Did the RP display the character mannerisms? [YES] 0.5 PT [NO] 0 PTS
- Self explanatory
Did the RP have world building to further the scene and argument as a whole? [YES] 2 PTS [SOMEWHAT] 1 PT [NOT AT ALL] 0 PTS
- If its simply: Camera on, empty arena, wrestler speaks into the mic, end scene. This is not at all.
Did the scene help showcase/highlights the characters gimmick? [YES] 2 PTS [SOMEWHAT] 1 PT [NOT AT ALL] 0 PTS
- Examples of this could be how a face/heel would interact with people around them or what locations they would frequent
- If they are strictly a fighter, maybe they are at the gym, seeking help from a trainer, honing their craft in some way
- If they have a "short fuse", do they show this when being hounded by a reporter or fans etc?
- Whatever it is they are known for, are they working the gimmick in someway in the scene?
FLOW
Was the RP easy to read and follow from start to finish? [YES] 1 PT [NO] 0 PTS
- Self explanatory
Did the RP have a clear ending? [YES] 1 PT [NO] 0 PTS
- It doesn't need to say "The End" or "FTB" but does it have a clear ending or does it feel like the last sentence is missing?
Did the RP transition smoothly from scene to scene? [YES] 0.5 PT [NO] 0 PTS
- Self explanatory
Did the RP transition smoothly between thoughts? [YES] 0.5 PT [NO] 0 PTS
- Self explanatory
Was it clear on who was speaking and when or what was thoughts vs narration? [YES] 0.5 PT [NO] 0 PTS
- Self explanatory
Was the RP appropriately paced or did it feel rushed/too long? [YES] 0.5 PT [NO] 0 PTS
- This is not about the word length, this is about the pacing of the RP.
- This is not about not hitting a word limit and leaving words off the paper, this is about the pacing of the RP.
- This is not about exceeding the word limit, this is about the pacing of the RP.
CREATIVITY / ENTERTAINMENT
Scene/location selection - is it clear where in the world the RP takes place? [YES] 1 PT [NO] 0 PTS
- Self explanatory
Scene/location details - do we get a sense of the world & the surroundings? [YES] 1 PT [NO] 0 PTS
- Self explanatory
Scene/location creativity - did the RP take place in a unique setting/location? [YES] 1 PT [NO] 0 PTS
- Self explanatory
Did the RP elicit a reaction? (laugh, gasp, etc) [YES] 1 PT [NO] 0 PTS
- Self explanatory
Overall creativity of the RP from word play to location settings [VERY CREATIVE] 2 PTS [SOMEWHAT CREATIVE] 1 PT [GENERIC] 0.5 PT
- Self explanatory
Overall entertainment value of the RP [ENGAGED THE ENTIRE TIME] 2 PTS [ENTERTAINING IN PARTS] 1 PT [TOO HARD TO FOLLOW] 0 PTS
- Self explanatory
--
FEEDBACK:
(1) Do not be rude, someone spent time to create this RP.
(2) Offer SPECIFIC feedback that will help the writer to improve in each of the areas they didn't get max points. "Could have been better" is not acceptable feedback.
(3) Mention at least one area that stood out as positive that the handler can build on
NOTES:
- Put yourself in the shoes of the writer/handler. If you read the feedback, would you personally understand how you could improve in that specific area?
- Provide feedback that will actually HELP the handler/writer to improve in that specific area.
- Do not offer generic nonsense like "Could have been better" "Could have done more" "It felt too long" "It felt too short". This is not feedback.
- Offer specifics like:
-- "This RP was entertaining in parts, but you lost me when you ... you can alter this next time to ..."
-- "Unfortunately you didn't mention where this RP took place. Next time, introduce us to the location & set the stage for us so we can picture it/place ourselves in that environment. I did enjoy seeing you build on ... and hope to see more of it"
-- "You did not mention any opponent in this RP, had no research nor did you mention that it was for the # Championship. I would encourage you to mention the opponent you are facing, find out some facts you can use about them and mention what is at stake. This will also help you sell yourself, the opponent and the match by talking about the significance of this opportunity they have. I did find it to be entertaining in parts, especially that ..."
-- "This was a flawless roleplay, really well done - one thing that really stood out to me that I feel you should definitely keep building on is ..."